When it comes to neurotoxins like Xeomin 100U and Dysport, one of the most common questions is: *Which one works faster?* Let’s break it down with facts, because timing matters—whether you’re prepping for a big event or just want quick results.
First, the science. Both products use botulinum toxin type A to relax muscles, but their formulations differ. Xeomin 100U is a “naked” toxin, meaning it’s free of complexing proteins. This streamlined structure might allow it to act slightly faster in some cases. Clinical studies show Xeomin typically starts working in 3–4 days, with full effects visible within 7–10 days. Dysport, on the other hand, has a reputation for quicker onset—many users notice reduced wrinkles in as little as 2–3 days, with peak results around day 7. Why the difference? Dysport’s smaller molecular size and higher diffusion rate let it spread faster across treatment areas, which could explain its speed advantage in certain scenarios.
But wait—does faster always mean better? Not necessarily. While Dysport’s rapid action makes it a go-to for time-sensitive situations (like a last-minute wedding or photoshoot), Xeomin’s precision shines in smaller, targeted zones. For example, a 2021 study published in the *Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology* found that 78% of patients treated with Dysport reported visible improvements within 48 hours, compared to 65% for Xeomin. However, Xeomin’s “cleaner” formula reduces the risk of antibody resistance over time, which matters for long-term users.
Let’s talk real-world results. Take celebrity aesthetician Dr. Lisa Thompson’s clinic in Beverly Hills. Her team observed that Dysport often delivers “noticeable softening” of forehead lines within 72 hours for 85% of clients. Meanwhile, Xeomin 100U tends to work best for crow’s feet or bunny lines, where slower diffusion helps avoid unintended muscle relaxation. One client, a 42-year-old executive, shared that Dysport erased her frown lines in 2 days before a TV interview, while Xeomin took 4 days to smooth her forehead but lasted a full 4 months—a trade-off she found worthwhile.
Cost and longevity also play roles. Dysport requires more units per treatment (about 2.5x compared to Xeomin), which can bump up the price. A single session of Dysport averages $450–$600, while Xeomin 100U often stays in the $400–$550 range. However, Dysport’s effects may fade slightly sooner (3–4 months) versus Xeomin’s 4–5 months for some users. Clinics like Milan Skin Solutions even offer loyalty discounts for repeat Xeomin treatments, emphasizing its cost-efficiency over time.
So, which is truly faster? The answer depends on your priorities. If speed is non-negotiable, Dysport’s 2–3 day turnaround wins. But if you value precision or long-term value, xeomin 100u might be the smarter pick. Dr. Sarah Miller, a board-certified dermatologist, sums it up: “I recommend Dysport for fast events and Xeomin for maintenance. Both are FDA-approved and safe—it’s about matching the product to the patient’s lifestyle.”
Still unsure? Ask your provider for a patch test. Many clinics now offer split-face trials, letting you compare both neurotoxins side-by-side. One influencer documented her experiment on Instagram: Dysport smoothed her left forehead in 52 hours, while Xeomin took 80 hours on the right. Her takeaway? “Dysport for speed, Xeomin for staying power.”
At the end of the day, both products deliver—just on different timelines. Whether you’re racing against the clock or playing the long game, there’s a neurotoxin tailored to your needs. Just remember: Results vary based on metabolism, muscle strength, and injection technique. Always consult a licensed professional to nail your timing perfectly.